item 7\nthe franchise owner might move the team to another city.\nthe solution being that if professional…

item 7\nthe franchise owner might move the team to another city.\nthe solution being that if professional teams to become public property.\nownership of the franchises should be transferred from individuals or\ncorporations to cities. after all, most teams play in stadiums owned by the city.\nwhy shouldnt the city control what goes on in their own facilities? *\nthe city government should appoint a commission. in supervise the operation\nof the citys teams. such an administration might be similar to the departments\nof police or public transit. * the commission would oversee tv rights and\nemploy experts responsible for ongoing team operations.\nit would set prices, determine salaries, hire and fire, and so forth. rather than\nat this point, the writer is considering adding the following accurate sentence:\nfor example, transit systems often lose money year after year.\nshould the writer make this addition here?\na. yes, because theres no correlation between sports and transit systems.\nb. yes, because it helps balance the arguments in favor of public ownership.\nc. no, because it reminds readers that the franchise could lose money.\nd. no, because money issues are not a factor in the argument.

item 7\nthe franchise owner might move the team to another city.\nthe solution being that if professional teams to become public property.\nownership of the franchises should be transferred from individuals or\ncorporations to cities. after all, most teams play in stadiums owned by the city.\nwhy shouldnt the city control what goes on in their own facilities? *\nthe city government should appoint a commission. in supervise the operation\nof the citys teams. such an administration might be similar to the departments\nof police or public transit. * the commission would oversee tv rights and\nemploy experts responsible for ongoing team operations.\nit would set prices, determine salaries, hire and fire, and so forth. rather than\nat this point, the writer is considering adding the following accurate sentence:\nfor example, transit systems often lose money year after year.\nshould the writer make this addition here?\na. yes, because theres no correlation between sports and transit systems.\nb. yes, because it helps balance the arguments in favor of public ownership.\nc. no, because it reminds readers that the franchise could lose money.\nd. no, because money issues are not a factor in the argument.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The text is about the transfer of franchise ownership to cities and the role of a city - appointed commission. The proposed addition about transit systems losing money is not relevant as the argument is centered around sports franchise ownership and city control, not on financial losses of other public services like transit. Money issues related to transit are not a factor in the current argument about sports franchise public ownership.

Answer:

D. No, because money issues are not a factor in the argument.