the leaning tower of pisa\nthe eight story leaning tower of pisa has a history behind its structure. the…

the leaning tower of pisa\nthe eight story leaning tower of pisa has a history behind its structure. the tower was built in phases, scattered over a period of over two centuries! the primary reason for this delay in completion was its weak foundation—it was built on soft soil consisting of clay and sand. in addition, the foundation laid for this 55 - meter high tower was just three meters in depth. as a result, when just three stories had been completed, the tower began to tilt—bringing the construction process to a halt.\nthe halt in construction stretched out to a hundred years. during this period, the foundation of the structure somewhat firmed up, preventing its collapse. a new architect took up the construction work in the fourteenth century and as a corrective measure, he built the next story by reversing the existing pattern—making the shorter side of the tower tall. he added four stories to the tower, but the tilt only worsened.\nthe work was paused yet again till the beginning of the nineteenth century. the construction was then resumed\nwhat sentence works best between the first and second paragraphs?\na. the foundation stone of the leaning tower of pisa was laid in the year 1173.\nb. so, the tower began to tilt and the construction process stopped.\nc. however, before any measures could be taken to fix this, certain internal conflicts began in italy

the leaning tower of pisa\nthe eight story leaning tower of pisa has a history behind its structure. the tower was built in phases, scattered over a period of over two centuries! the primary reason for this delay in completion was its weak foundation—it was built on soft soil consisting of clay and sand. in addition, the foundation laid for this 55 - meter high tower was just three meters in depth. as a result, when just three stories had been completed, the tower began to tilt—bringing the construction process to a halt.\nthe halt in construction stretched out to a hundred years. during this period, the foundation of the structure somewhat firmed up, preventing its collapse. a new architect took up the construction work in the fourteenth century and as a corrective measure, he built the next story by reversing the existing pattern—making the shorter side of the tower tall. he added four stories to the tower, but the tilt only worsened.\nthe work was paused yet again till the beginning of the nineteenth century. the construction was then resumed\nwhat sentence works best between the first and second paragraphs?\na. the foundation stone of the leaning tower of pisa was laid in the year 1173.\nb. so, the tower began to tilt and the construction process stopped.\nc. however, before any measures could be taken to fix this, certain internal conflicts began in italy

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  • Option A just gives the year the foundation stone was laid. It doesn't connect well with the first paragraph (which is about the tower's structure and initial problems) and the second paragraph (which is about the halt in construction and later resumption).
  • Option B is too abrupt. The first paragraph ends with the tower beginning to tilt and construction stopping. The second paragraph is about the halt stretching out. But there is no indication in the first paragraph that "So" (as in a direct consequence) is appropriate. The first paragraph's reason for the delay is the weak foundation.
  • Option C: The first paragraph ends with the tower beginning to tilt and construction stopping. Option C's "However, before any measures could be taken to fix this (the tilt), certain internal conflicts began in Italy" provides a logical transition. The "this" refers to the tilt problem. And then the second paragraph talks about the halt in construction (due to internal conflicts) stretching out.

Answer:

C. However, before any measures could be taken to fix this, certain internal conflicts began in Italy