leo is writing an essay arguing that school cafeterias should focus more on taste than nutrition. which…

leo is writing an essay arguing that school cafeterias should focus more on taste than nutrition. which would be a good way to start leos conclusion? school food is gross. school food in other countries is actually delicious. its time for us to come together to fight against the internet! when it comes to school lunch, schools should care more about the students tastebuds than calories.

leo is writing an essay arguing that school cafeterias should focus more on taste than nutrition. which would be a good way to start leos conclusion? school food is gross. school food in other countries is actually delicious. its time for us to come together to fight against the internet! when it comes to school lunch, schools should care more about the students tastebuds than calories.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The conclusion of an essay should restate the main argument. Leo's argument is that school cafeterias should focus more on taste than nutrition. The option "When it comes to school lunch, schools should care more about the students' tastebuds than calories" directly restates this argument. "School food is gross" is too simplistic and doesn't restate the argument properly. "School food in other countries is actually delicious" is off - topic as it doesn't focus on Leo's main point about his own school's cafeteria. "It's time for us to come together to fight against the Internet!" is completely irrelevant.

Answer:

When it comes to school lunch, schools should care more about the students' tastebuds than calories.