the new popular downloadable app, apptletters, should be taken off the market immediately. it is a game…

the new popular downloadable app, apptletters, should be taken off the market immediately. it is a game where players capture spinning letters in order to fill up massive black holes worth gazillions of points. tragically, it is so compelling, so enticing, that players plaster their faces to the screen for hours. lack of regulation concerning apptletterss prohibition is akin to allowing embezzlers the opportunity to possess the only keys to our hometown banks. how does the use of an analogy affect the argument being made? 1 it is not properly used because it is placed at the end of the argument. 2 it fails to add clarity and is not rationally related to the issue. 3 it relies on a logical progression that requires the opposite conclusion.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
The analogy compares lack of ApptLetters regulation to allowing embezzlers bank keys. But there's no rational link between a game's potential harm (players being glued to screens) and embezzlement. The analogy doesn't clarify the argument about the app's removal.
Answer:
- It fails to add clarity and is not rationally related to the issue.