question 7 of 10\ncamille is writing an essay about the parallels between arthur millers play the crucible…

question 7 of 10\ncamille is writing an essay about the parallels between arthur millers play the crucible and mccarthyism in the 1950s. in doing her research, she finds this quotation in a published theater review: joseph mccarthy looms large over millers crucible, in spirit if not in name. should camille quote the review directly or paraphrase it in her paper?\na. she should paraphrase it because it is not the focus of her paper.\nb. she should quote it because it would be impossible to paraphrase.\nc. she should paraphrase it because it is not a specific fact.\nd. she should quote it because it includes unique wording.

question 7 of 10\ncamille is writing an essay about the parallels between arthur millers play the crucible and mccarthyism in the 1950s. in doing her research, she finds this quotation in a published theater review: joseph mccarthy looms large over millers crucible, in spirit if not in name. should camille quote the review directly or paraphrase it in her paper?\na. she should paraphrase it because it is not the focus of her paper.\nb. she should quote it because it would be impossible to paraphrase.\nc. she should paraphrase it because it is not a specific fact.\nd. she should quote it because it includes unique wording.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

When a source has unique wording, it is best to quote it directly. Paraphrasing might lose the original nuance. In this case, the phrase "Joseph McCarthy looms large over Miller's Crucible, in spirit if not in name" has a specific and unique way of expressing the connection. Options A and C are incorrect as the nature of the content (not being the focus or not a specific fact) doesn't override the uniqueness of the wording. Option B is wrong because it is not impossible to paraphrase, but quoting is better due to the unique phrasing.

Answer:

D. She should quote it because it includes unique wording.