question 3 (2 points)\n(03.02 lc)\nwhat is the purpose of a counterclaim in argumentative writing?\no a it…

question 3 (2 points)\n(03.02 lc)\nwhat is the purpose of a counterclaim in argumentative writing?\no a it uses emotion to emphasize your claim.\no b it agrees with your position on the topic.\no c it lists the facts and evidence for your claim.\no d it acknowledges the opposing side of the argument.\nquestion 4 (2 points)\n(03.01 lc)\nin argumentative writing, a rebuttal\no a makes the reader think the counterclaim may be correct after all\no b explains, with evidence, why the counterclaim is incorrect or logically flawed\no c lists the reasons why someone may disagree with the writers claim\no d uses emotions to persuade the reader why the opposing position is incorrect

question 3 (2 points)\n(03.02 lc)\nwhat is the purpose of a counterclaim in argumentative writing?\no a it uses emotion to emphasize your claim.\no b it agrees with your position on the topic.\no c it lists the facts and evidence for your claim.\no d it acknowledges the opposing side of the argument.\nquestion 4 (2 points)\n(03.01 lc)\nin argumentative writing, a rebuttal\no a makes the reader think the counterclaim may be correct after all\no b explains, with evidence, why the counterclaim is incorrect or logically flawed\no c lists the reasons why someone may disagree with the writers claim\no d uses emotions to persuade the reader why the opposing position is incorrect

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In argumentative writing, a counterclaim is used to address the opposing side of the argument. This helps in presenting a more comprehensive and balanced view. Option d correctly describes the purpose of a counterclaim as it acknowledges the opposing side. Options a, b, and c are incorrect. Option a is about using emotion (not related to counterclaim purpose), option b is about agreeing with one's position (not counterclaim), and option c is about listing facts for one's claim (not counterclaim).

Answer:

d. It acknowledges the opposing side of the argument.