read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: scout is a good dog. evidence: scout consistently follows…

read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: scout is a good dog. evidence: scout consistently follows her masters commands. why does the evidence support the claim? choose the analysis that better explains the connection. good dogs are obedient. scout is playful and affectionate.

read the claim and the supporting evidence. claim: scout is a good dog. evidence: scout consistently follows her masters commands. why does the evidence support the claim? choose the analysis that better explains the connection. good dogs are obedient. scout is playful and affectionate.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The claim is that Scout is a good dog and the evidence is her obedience. The idea that good dogs are obedient directly links the evidence (following commands = obedience) to the claim. The second option about playfulness and affection is not related to the given evidence of following commands.

Answer:

Good dogs are obedient.