1) read \progress in parkinsons: deconstructing dopamine degeneration\ and michael j. foxs testimony to…

1) read \progress in parkinsons: deconstructing dopamine degeneration\ and michael j. foxs testimony to congress. based on the information from both selections, write a response to the following: argue how the treatments for parkinsons have or have not changed from foxs 1999 testimony to the 2022 nih article. write a well - organized argumentative essay that uses specific evidence from the excerpt to support your answer. remember to: - clearly state your opinion - organize your writing - develop your ideas in detail - use evidence from the selection in your response - include a counterargument - use correct spelling, capitalization, punctuation, and grammar manage your time carefully so that you can: - review the selection - plan your response - write your response - revise and edit your response write your response in the box provided.

1) read \progress in parkinsons: deconstructing dopamine degeneration\ and michael j. foxs testimony to congress. based on the information from both selections, write a response to the following: argue how the treatments for parkinsons have or have not changed from foxs 1999 testimony to the 2022 nih article. write a well - organized argumentative essay that uses specific evidence from the excerpt to support your answer. remember to: - clearly state your opinion - organize your writing - develop your ideas in detail - use evidence from the selection in your response - include a counterargument - use correct spelling, capitalization, punctuation, and grammar manage your time carefully so that you can: - review the selection - plan your response - write your response - revise and edit your response write your response in the box provided.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

To answer this, one would first read the two - given sources to gather information about Parkinson's treatments in 1999 from Fox's testimony and in 2022 from the NIH article. Then, identify similarities and differences in treatment approaches, such as new drugs, therapies, or changes in understanding of the disease. Present a clear opinion in the essay, for example, arguing that treatments have advanced due to new research or that some fundamental aspects remain the same. Use specific evidence like mention of new medications or changes in surgical techniques from the sources. Also, include a counter - argument to strengthen the essay, such as why some might think treatments haven't changed as much as claimed.

Answer:

An essay would need to be written following the steps above, presenting a well - organized argument with evidence and a counter - argument about how Parkinson's treatments have or have not changed from 1999 to 2022.