section i directions first nations) hired him to catalog their collection. (5) the dewey decimal system…

section i directions first nations) hired him to catalog their collection. (5) the dewey decimal system classifies most indigenous topics in the history sections - an approach that fails to consider indigenous perspectives. (6) in contrast, deer developed his own system of classification based on topics and relationships in indigenous writing that reflect onkwehon:we (original peoples) realities. (7) this system is now used at the xwi7xwa library at the university of british columbia, the union of british columbia indian chiefs resource centre, and the aanischaaukamikw cree cultural institute in oujé - bougoumou, quebec. (8) in 2003, paul macdonell, reiko tagami, and paul washington wrote a research paper on the deer classification system while studying at the university of british columbia. (9) some librarians argue that the brian deer classification system is too narrowly focused and lacks the precision of other classification systems. (10) while this may be true, wagner says that “where traditional library classification systems reflect eurocentric...perspectives, brian deer’s was created to allow for the expression of indigenous world views.” 44 mark for review the writer is considering deleting sentence 8 from the passage. should the writer delete this sentence? a keep it, because it provides commentary that explains the claim made in the previous sentence. b keep it, because it emphasizes the importance of being familiar with developments in one’s chosen field. c delete it, because it does not explain why macdonell, tagami, and washington should be considered experts on classification systems. d delete it, because it offers evidence that does not help develop the line of reasoning in this paragraph.

section i directions first nations) hired him to catalog their collection. (5) the dewey decimal system classifies most indigenous topics in the history sections - an approach that fails to consider indigenous perspectives. (6) in contrast, deer developed his own system of classification based on topics and relationships in indigenous writing that reflect onkwehon:we (original peoples) realities. (7) this system is now used at the xwi7xwa library at the university of british columbia, the union of british columbia indian chiefs resource centre, and the aanischaaukamikw cree cultural institute in oujé - bougoumou, quebec. (8) in 2003, paul macdonell, reiko tagami, and paul washington wrote a research paper on the deer classification system while studying at the university of british columbia. (9) some librarians argue that the brian deer classification system is too narrowly focused and lacks the precision of other classification systems. (10) while this may be true, wagner says that “where traditional library classification systems reflect eurocentric...perspectives, brian deer’s was created to allow for the expression of indigenous world views.” 44 mark for review the writer is considering deleting sentence 8 from the passage. should the writer delete this sentence? a keep it, because it provides commentary that explains the claim made in the previous sentence. b keep it, because it emphasizes the importance of being familiar with developments in one’s chosen field. c delete it, because it does not explain why macdonell, tagami, and washington should be considered experts on classification systems. d delete it, because it offers evidence that does not help develop the line of reasoning in this paragraph.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Sentence 8 provides specific examples of researchers who wrote about the Deer Classification System. This supports the idea presented in previous sentences about the development of the Deer Classification System and its significance. It is relevant evidence for the claims made in the paragraph.

Answer:

A. Keep it, because it provides commentary that explains the claim made in the previous sentence.