which sentence is punctuated correctly? \n1. only one candidate should be elected mayor john smith. \n2…

which sentence is punctuated correctly? \n1. only one candidate should be elected mayor john smith. \n2. only one candidate should be elected mayor; jon smith. \n3. only one candidate...should be elected mayor jon smith. \n4. only one candidate should be elected mayor—jon smith.

which sentence is punctuated correctly? \n1. only one candidate should be elected mayor john smith. \n2. only one candidate should be elected mayor; jon smith. \n3. only one candidate...should be elected mayor jon smith. \n4. only one candidate should be elected mayor—jon smith.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

To determine the correct punctuation, we analyze each option:

  • Option 1: Lacks punctuation to separate the title "mayor" and the name "John Smith", creating a run - on.
  • Option 2: A semicolon is incorrect here as it should separate two independent clauses, but "Jon Smith" is not an independent clause.
  • Option 3: The ellipsis is misused; it doesn't fit the context of this sentence.
  • Option 4: An em - dash is correctly used to set off the appositive "Jon Smith", which renames or identifies the candidate for mayor.

Answer:

  1. Only one candidate should be elected mayor—Jon Smith.