there is no strife, no prejudice, no national conflict in outer space as yet. its hazards are hostile to us…

there is no strife, no prejudice, no national conflict in outer space as yet. its hazards are hostile to us all. its conquest deserves the best of all mankind, and its opportunity for peaceful cooperation may never come again. but why, some say, the moon? why choose this as our goal? and they may well ask why climb the highest mountain? why, 35 years ago, fly the atlantic? why does rice play texas? which of the following is an example of parallelism? \there is no strife, no prejudice, no national conflict in outer space as yet.\ \its hazards are hostile to us all.\ \its conquest deserves the best of all mankind.\

there is no strife, no prejudice, no national conflict in outer space as yet. its hazards are hostile to us all. its conquest deserves the best of all mankind, and its opportunity for peaceful cooperation may never come again. but why, some say, the moon? why choose this as our goal? and they may well ask why climb the highest mountain? why, 35 years ago, fly the atlantic? why does rice play texas? which of the following is an example of parallelism? \there is no strife, no prejudice, no national conflict in outer space as yet.\ \its hazards are hostile to us all.\ \its conquest deserves the best of all mankind.\

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Parallelism is a rhetorical device where structures are repeated for emphasis. The phrase "no strife, no prejudice, no national conflict" uses the repeated "no + noun" structure.

Answer:

"There is no strife, no prejudice, no national conflict in outer space as yet."