a successful modern dancer is writing an autobiography. read the piece of information in each row, then…

a successful modern dancer is writing an autobiography. read the piece of information in each row, then select the section where it fits best. i was at a point in my career when i wanted to explore internal feelings and veer away from showiness. it was then that i met amber, a choreographer who encouraged her dancers to close their eyes and move from within. i come from a long line of football enthusiasts. the assumption held by my older relatives that all of their male offspring would enjoy and play the game had never before been questioned. when i was a young boy, a babysitter was switching television channels when she settled on a public television

a successful modern dancer is writing an autobiography. read the piece of information in each row, then select the section where it fits best. i was at a point in my career when i wanted to explore internal feelings and veer away from showiness. it was then that i met amber, a choreographer who encouraged her dancers to close their eyes and move from within. i come from a long line of football enthusiasts. the assumption held by my older relatives that all of their male offspring would enjoy and play the game had never before been questioned. when i was a young boy, a babysitter was switching television channels when she settled on a public television

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  • The first text mentions meeting Amber (a choreographer), which is about a colleague/collaborator.
  • The second text is about family (older relatives) and their assumptions, which is not directly about inspiration, challenges/obstacles but rather a background related to family (could be seen as a context but in the given options, if we assume it's about the person's journey and the people around - relatives - but in the table's context, if we consider it's about the people in the career path (colleagues/collaborators in a broader sense of people involved in the life story), but actually, if we strictly follow the table's logic:
    • The first row: Meeting a choreographer (Amber) - related to colleagues/collaborators.
    • The second row: If we assume it's about the challenges (the assumption of relatives - but in the table's columns, if we have to choose from the given three, and since it's about people (relatives - in a sense of people in the life story, but more accurately, if we consider it's about the person's own path and the people who influenced - but in the table's context, the first row is clearly colleagues/collaborators (meeting a choreographer - a professional connection). The second row, if we assume it's about the challenges (the wrong assumption of relatives - but the table has "Challenges & obstacles" - if the assumption was an obstacle, but the text says "the assumption...had never before been questioned" - it's more of a background. But if we have to fit, the first row is colleagues/collaborators.
  • The third text (incomplete) - but if we assume it's about inspiration (seeing something on TV - a common inspiration source).

Answer:

  • First row: Colleagues & collaborators
  • Second row: Challenges & obstacles (if we consider the wrong assumption as an obstacle)
  • Third row: Inspiration (assuming it's about being inspired by what was on TV)