ten months ago, i wrote a blog post about the legendary basketball coach, phil jackson. (1) the mid - point…

ten months ago, i wrote a blog post about the legendary basketball coach, phil jackson. (1) the mid - point of figuring out my next chapter, as i was in the midst of figuring out my next chapter, ten months ago, i wrote a blog post about legendary basketball coach, phil jackson. (2) i expressed chagrin at how a man like phil jackson was essentially being put out to pasture. (3) he was getting coaching offers, but he had made it clear that he didnt want to coach, and it seemed like teams were missing out on the opportunity to benefit from his wisdom due to their lack of imagination. (4) last week, jackson was named president of the new york knicks. (5) if you know basketball, you know that this was an eyebrow - raising development for two reasons. (6) first, the owner of the knicks is widely acknowledged as one of the worst owners in the nba, largely due to his meddling ways. (7) its hard to imagine that match working, although he has repeatedly been on record since last week that jackson will have full control over basketball - related decisions. (8) second, it was somewhat surprising that the los angeles lakers never found a way to make it work with jackson, given that the lead them to five championships and is engaged to one of the owners of the team. short answer: what is another way the author could transition into paragraph 3? what change is needed in sentence 6? a change knicks to knicks b change acknowledged to acknowledge c change meddling to meddling d delete the comma after nba what is the best way to rewrite sentence 1? a as i was in the midst of figuring out my next chapter, ten months ago, i wrote a blog post about legendary basketball coach, phil jackson. b i wrote a blog post about legendary basketball coach, phil jackson, ten months ago, as i was in the midst of figuring out my next chapter. c ten months ago, as i was in the midst of figuring out my next chapter, i wrote a blog post about legendary basketball coach, phil jackson.

ten months ago, i wrote a blog post about the legendary basketball coach, phil jackson. (1) the mid - point of figuring out my next chapter, as i was in the midst of figuring out my next chapter, ten months ago, i wrote a blog post about legendary basketball coach, phil jackson. (2) i expressed chagrin at how a man like phil jackson was essentially being put out to pasture. (3) he was getting coaching offers, but he had made it clear that he didnt want to coach, and it seemed like teams were missing out on the opportunity to benefit from his wisdom due to their lack of imagination. (4) last week, jackson was named president of the new york knicks. (5) if you know basketball, you know that this was an eyebrow - raising development for two reasons. (6) first, the owner of the knicks is widely acknowledged as one of the worst owners in the nba, largely due to his meddling ways. (7) its hard to imagine that match working, although he has repeatedly been on record since last week that jackson will have full control over basketball - related decisions. (8) second, it was somewhat surprising that the los angeles lakers never found a way to make it work with jackson, given that the lead them to five championships and is engaged to one of the owners of the team. short answer: what is another way the author could transition into paragraph 3? what change is needed in sentence 6? a change knicks to knicks b change acknowledged to acknowledge c change meddling to meddling d delete the comma after nba what is the best way to rewrite sentence 1? a as i was in the midst of figuring out my next chapter, ten months ago, i wrote a blog post about legendary basketball coach, phil jackson. b i wrote a blog post about legendary basketball coach, phil jackson, ten months ago, as i was in the midst of figuring out my next chapter. c ten months ago, as i was in the midst of figuring out my next chapter, i wrote a blog post about legendary basketball coach, phil jackson.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  1. In sentence 6, "knicks" should be capitalized as it refers to the New York Knicks, a proper - noun.
  2. For the transition into paragraph 3, a more effective way could be to summarize the previous points about Jackson and then introduce a new aspect related to his coaching or the team's situation.

Answer:

  1. Change "knicks" to "Knicks"
  2. A better transition could start by briefly recapping Jackson's situation and then posing a new question or idea about his coaching or the team's future.