think of it this way, your ancestors navigated by the stars, and today most people wont walk outside without…

think of it this way, your ancestors navigated by the stars, and today most people wont walk outside without a gps. thats a crazy loss of direction or skill at some level for sure. and while indigenous peoples and many rural peoples can still see the stars, most of the worlds population cannot. thats particularly an urban thing, where theres all this light. from my farm, through the open skies, at night i can see the glow of detroit lakes, and thats 25 miles away. - *a case for waawaatesi, * winona laduke which statement best describes the point laduke is making in the passage? the world has changed drastically due to technology. how does the writer appeal to the readers logic? by contrasting navigating by the stars with gps by pointing out that some people still see the stars by including the fact that she lives on a farm
Answer
Brief Explanations:
The writer contrasts ancestors navigating by stars (a traditional, skill - based method) with modern people relying on GPS (a technology - driven method). This contrast is a logical appeal as it shows a change (loss of a certain skill/direction sense) due to technology. Pointing out that some people still see the stars is more of a factual statement rather than a strong logical appeal. Mentioning the farm is just a detail about the writer's location and not a logical appeal.
Answer:
by contrasting navigating by the stars with GPS