use the sentence to answer the question. this sentence is from the summary portion of a book review. select…

use the sentence to answer the question. this sentence is from the summary portion of a book review. select “yes” or “no” to show whether each change would make the sentence more objective. (2 points) then we learn that the concept for this machine began with one doctor’s brazen idea of connecting a patient to another patient’s blood supply. “bloody and beating” by randi hutter epstein, from the new york times, november 5, 2018. copyright © 2018 by the new york times company. all rights reserved. used under license. remove the word “supply” remove the word “brazen” change “concept” to “brilliant idea” change “we learn” to “readers learn”

use the sentence to answer the question. this sentence is from the summary portion of a book review. select “yes” or “no” to show whether each change would make the sentence more objective. (2 points) then we learn that the concept for this machine began with one doctor’s brazen idea of connecting a patient to another patient’s blood supply. “bloody and beating” by randi hutter epstein, from the new york times, november 5, 2018. copyright © 2018 by the new york times company. all rights reserved. used under license. remove the word “supply” remove the word “brazen” change “concept” to “brilliant idea” change “we learn” to “readers learn”

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  • "Supply" is a neutral - term, removing it doesn't make the sentence more objective.
  • "Brazen" is a subjective adjective, removing it makes the sentence more objective.
  • "Brilliant" is a subjective adjective, changing "concept" to it makes the sentence less objective.
  • Changing "we learn" to "readers learn" is a more objective way of stating as it removes the personal - sounding "we".

Answer:

remove the word "supply": No remove the word "brazen": Yes change "concept" to "brilliant idea": No change "we learn" to "readers learn": Yes