writing poetry is like cooking. novices always follow a recipe because they know no other way while masters…

writing poetry is like cooking. novices always follow a recipe because they know no other way while masters know precisely what spices to add, how long to bake the fish to make it delectable, perfectly flaky. those rare masters keep the restaurant of life always open. what is the implication of the analogy used in the poem? 1 if chefs want to be truly great, they cannot always follow other peoples recipes. 2 novice poets need to use precise rhythm or their works will turn out dry and tasteless. 3 poets who have mastered their craft do not need to follow a strict form.

writing poetry is like cooking. novices always follow a recipe because they know no other way while masters know precisely what spices to add, how long to bake the fish to make it delectable, perfectly flaky. those rare masters keep the restaurant of life always open. what is the implication of the analogy used in the poem? 1 if chefs want to be truly great, they cannot always follow other peoples recipes. 2 novice poets need to use precise rhythm or their works will turn out dry and tasteless. 3 poets who have mastered their craft do not need to follow a strict form.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The poem compares writing poetry to cooking. Novices follow a recipe (a strict form), while masters know what to add and how to create a great result without strictly adhering to a set - way. In the context of poetry, this implies that master poets don't need to follow a strict form.

Answer:

  1. Poets who have mastered their craft do not need to follow a strict form.