writing poetry is like cooking. novices always follow a recipe because they know no other way while masters…

writing poetry is like cooking. novices always follow a recipe because they know no other way while masters know precisely what spices to add, how long to bake the fish to make it delectable, perfectly flaky. those rare masters keep the restaurant of life always open. what is the implication of the analogy used in the poem? 1 if chefs want to be truly great, they cannot always follow other people’s recipes. 2 novice poets need to use precise rhythm or their works will turn out dry and tasteless. 3 poets who have mastered their craft do not need to follow a strict form.

writing poetry is like cooking. novices always follow a recipe because they know no other way while masters know precisely what spices to add, how long to bake the fish to make it delectable, perfectly flaky. those rare masters keep the restaurant of life always open. what is the implication of the analogy used in the poem? 1 if chefs want to be truly great, they cannot always follow other people’s recipes. 2 novice poets need to use precise rhythm or their works will turn out dry and tasteless. 3 poets who have mastered their craft do not need to follow a strict form.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The poem compares writing poetry to cooking. Novices in both fields follow a set - way (recipe for cooking, a form for poetry). Masters, however, have the knowledge and skill to deviate from the norm and create something great. Just as master chefs know how to improvise with spices and cooking times, master poets don't need to strictly follow a form.

Answer:

  1. Poets who have mastered their craft do not need to follow a strict form.