writing a research - based argumentative essay about a debatable topic\nquiz complete\ntime…

writing a research - based argumentative essay about a debatable topic\nquiz complete\ntime remaining\n55:48\nread the claim.\nhuman bodies have developed over time to support a vegetarian diet.\nread the counterclaim.\nhumans have eaten meat along with plants for more than two million years, contributing to our successful evolution.\nread the rebuttal.\nevolution is the process of development over history, meaning that change in diet is constant.\nwhich statement best analyzes the rebuttal?\nit is effective because it creates emphasis by adding reasoning to the claim.\nit is effective because it provides both empirical and logical supporting evidence.\nit is ineffective because it does not address or acknowledge the counterclaim.\nit is ineffective because it does not logically point out a flaw in the counterclaim.

writing a research - based argumentative essay about a debatable topic\nquiz complete\ntime remaining\n55:48\nread the claim.\nhuman bodies have developed over time to support a vegetarian diet.\nread the counterclaim.\nhumans have eaten meat along with plants for more than two million years, contributing to our successful evolution.\nread the rebuttal.\nevolution is the process of development over history, meaning that change in diet is constant.\nwhich statement best analyzes the rebuttal?\nit is effective because it creates emphasis by adding reasoning to the claim.\nit is effective because it provides both empirical and logical supporting evidence.\nit is ineffective because it does not address or acknowledge the counterclaim.\nit is ineffective because it does not logically point out a flaw in the counterclaim.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The counterclaim emphasizes that humans have eaten meat for over two million years, contributing to evolution. The rebuttal simply defines evolution as a process of change over history with constant diet change. It fails to directly address the counterclaim's point about the long - standing consumption of meat and its role in evolution. A good rebuttal should logically point out flaws in the counterclaim. Here, the rebuttal does not do that.

Answer:

It is ineffective because it does not logically point out a flaw in the counterclaim.