which writing strategy is most effective for documenting the side effects of a medication in a patients…
which writing strategy is most effective for documenting the side effects of a medication in a patients profile?\nnarrative\ndescriptive\npersuasive\nanalytical\nquestion 12 (3.75 points)\nwhen sending out an email about a new policy for patient check - ins, which writing strategy could help provide clear instructions and examples?\nanalytical\nnarrative\npersuasive\ndescriptive
Answer
Brief Explanations:
- For the first question:
- Narrative writing tells a story, which is not ideal for documenting side - effects.
- Descriptive writing focuses on details and characteristics. Documenting side - effects requires listing and detailing symptoms, which descriptive writing can do effectively.
- Persuasive writing aims to convince, which is not relevant here.
- Analytical writing involves breaking down and analyzing, but for a simple documentation of side - effects (like listing symptoms, their severity, etc.), descriptive is more straightforward.
- For the second question:
- Analytical writing can break down the policy, explain its components, and provide clear instructions. For example, it can analyze each step of the check - in process (e.g., "First, the patient will need to present [X] document. Analyzing this step, it ensures [Y] verification...").
- Narrative is for storytelling and not for giving instructions.
- Persuasive is for convincing, not for instruction - giving.
- Descriptive can detail, but analytical writing can better structure the instructions (e.g., by cause - effect analysis of each instruction in the policy).
Answer:
First question: Descriptive Second question: Analytical