when would you use a summary or paraphrasing as evidence instead of a direct quote?\nwhen you are describing…

when would you use a summary or paraphrasing as evidence instead of a direct quote?\nwhen you are describing something that happens over a period of time in a poem, story, or novel\nwhen you want to add authority and credibility to your claim, because a quote is always more powerful than a summary\nwhen you want to discuss a historical event or scientific discovery\nwhen you are going to discuss a detail about the diction, syntax, imagery, or other specific element of the quote in your analysis

when would you use a summary or paraphrasing as evidence instead of a direct quote?\nwhen you are describing something that happens over a period of time in a poem, story, or novel\nwhen you want to add authority and credibility to your claim, because a quote is always more powerful than a summary\nwhen you want to discuss a historical event or scientific discovery\nwhen you are going to discuss a detail about the diction, syntax, imagery, or other specific element of the quote in your analysis

Answer

Brief Explanations:

When describing events over time in literature (like a poem, story, or novel), a summary or paraphrase is better. Direct quotes are for specific language analysis. The second option is wrong as summaries/paraphrases can be powerful too. The third option (historical/scientific) might need quotes for exact info. The fourth is for direct quote analysis.

Answer:

When you are describing something that happens over a period of time in a poem, story, or novel.