QUESTION IMAGE
Question
an airline would like information on which seat is preferred by customers. the airline assumes the majority of customers prefer the window seat, and is looking for evidence to support that claim. the results of a simple random sample of customer seat preference is shown below.
airline customer sample
window seat 196
observations 350
confidence level 0.95
critical value 1.64
test statistic (z) 2.24
p - value 0.0124
identify the population parameter.
pick
what condition for using a z - distribution is met?
pick
what is the level of significance? ex: 0.12
what is the null hypothesis $h_0$? pick
what is the alternative hypothesis $h_a$? pick
should $h_0$ be rejected or does $h_0$ fail to be rejected? pick
what conclusion can be drawn from the data?
pick
Step1: Identify population parameter
The parameter is the proportion of all airline customers who prefer window seats, denoted as \(p\).
Step2: Check z-distribution condition
Calculate sample proportion: \(\hat{p} = \frac{196}{350} = 0.56\)
Verify: \(n\hat{p} = 350*0.56 = 196 \geq 10\), \(n(1-\hat{p}) = 350*(1-0.56) = 154 \geq 10\). Large sample condition is met.
Step3: Find significance level
Significance level \(\alpha = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05\)
Step4: State null hypothesis
\(H_0: p = 0.5\) (no majority preference)
Step5: State alternative hypothesis
\(H_a: p > 0.5\) (majority prefer window seats)
Step6: Make decision
Compare p-value to \(\alpha\): \(0.0124 < 0.05\), so reject \(H_0\).
Step7: Draw conclusion
Rejecting \(H_0\) provides evidence for the airline's claim of majority window seat preference.
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
- Population parameter: The proportion of all airline customers who prefer window seats
- Met z-distribution condition: \(n\hat{p} \geq 10\) and \(n(1-\hat{p}) \geq 10\) (or "Sample size is large enough")
- Level of significance: \(0.05\)
- Null hypothesis \(H_0\): \(p = 0.5\)
- Alternative hypothesis \(H_a\): \(p > 0.5\)
- Decision: Reject \(H_0\)
- Conclusion: There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the majority of customers prefer window seats.