Question

consider this claim:

the best way to wear a baseball cap is with the visor in the front to protect your eyes from the sun.

now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents the strongest and most reasonable counterclaim to the above claim?

only people with no fashion sense at all wear baseball caps with the visors forward.

hats with full brims, like safari hats, offer better all - around sun protection than baseball caps do.

wearing a baseball cap with the visor in the back protects the back of your neck from sunburn.

Explanation:

The original claim states the best way to wear a baseball cap is visor forward for eye sun protection. A strong counterclaim directly addresses the baseball cap's use and provides a reasonable alternative benefit. The first option is an ad hominem attack, not a logical counter. The second option compares to a different hat type, not addressing baseball cap wear. The third option offers a valid, sun-related benefit of wearing the cap visor back, directly countering the "best way" claim.

Answer:

Wearing a baseball cap with the visor in the back protects the back of your neck from sunburn.