Question

evaluate whether each source is a valid source for online research drag each item to the correct category(2 points)yesnowikipedia article college history professor’s website about her area of expertisea blog by someone who has no biography or credentials listed the national archives

Explanation:

• A college history professor's website focused on their expertise is created by a credentialed subject-matter expert, making it valid. The National Archives is an official, authoritative repository of primary/secondary sources, so it is valid.
• Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone without formal review, so they are not reliable for academic research. A blog by an anonymous, uncredentialed author has no verifiable expertise or accountability, so it is not valid.

Answer:

Yes:

• college history professor's website about her area of expertise
• the National Archives

No:

• Wikipedia article
• a blog by someone who has no biography or credentials listed