Question

the following sentences are taken from a rhetorical analysis by isabelle gill. which of these sentences are likely found in the findings and discussion section of her essay, and which are likely found in the conclusions and implications section? findings and discussion this research could be extended to analyze the portrayal of other female characters in disney movies as well as media representations of female characters in other kinds of movies. analysis of word count reinforces this tendency toward negative characterizations—out of the 38 film reviews analyzed, only 9 devote more words to positive descriptions of the characters than negative ones. whether or not disney heroines should be idols for young girls will most likely remain open to debate; however, researchers and the public cannot ignore gendered misrepresentations of the princesses in film reviews, and should consider the ways in which these misrepresentations influence internal biases or prejudices against the princesses. additionally, there are 54 coded instances of reviewers choosing to include neutral terms that could be considered weakened versions of masculine language—for example, using “plucky” rather than “brave” when adjectives like “courageous,” “gutsy,” “heroic,” or “valiant” could have been chosen. conclusions and implications

Explanation:

The findings and discussion section presents research results and analysis. The sentences about word - count analysis and coded instances of language use are presenting research findings. The conclusions and implications section sums up the study and suggests future directions or implications. The sentences about extending the research and the open - ended debate are more in line with conclusions and implications.

Answer:

Findings and discussion:
Analysis of word count reinforces this tendency toward negative characterizations—out of the 38 film reviews analyzed, only 9 devote more words to positive descriptions of the characters than negative ones.
Additionally, there are 54 coded instances of reviewers choosing to include neutral terms that could be considered weakened versions of masculine language—for example, using "plucky" rather than "brave" when adjectives like "courageous," "gutsy," "heroic," or "valiant" could have been chosen.

Conclusions and implications:
This research could be extended to analyze the portrayal of other female characters in Disney movies as well as media representations of female characters in other kinds of movies.
Whether or not Disney heroines should be idols for young girls will most likely remain open to debate; however, researchers and the public cannot ignore gendered misrepresentations of the princesses in film reviews, and should consider the ways in which these misrepresentations influence internal biases or prejudices against the princesses.