the highlighted sentence below... teachers should allow students to listen to their favorite music when completing independent work in class. dr. amit sood of the mayo clinic explains that \melodious sounds help encourage the release of dopamine,\ a hormone in the brain that makes humans feel happy. because music causes the release of feel - good hormones, students are more likely to think positively about their schoolwork if they can listen to their favorite artists during class time. does not need a citation needs a citation

Question

Accepted Answer

# Brief Explanations:
The highlighted sentence presents a claim (students are more likely to think positively about schoolwork with favorite music) that is based on the earlier - cited explanation from Dr. Amit Sood about music and dopamine release. However, the highlighted sentence's own reasoning (connecting music - induced hormone release to positive schoolwork attitude) is a new assertion or interpretation that is not common knowledge and is building on the cited research. To support this specific claim about the impact on schoolwork attitude, a citation would be needed if the reasoning isn't general knowledge. But wait, actually, the highlighted sentence is drawing a conclusion from the previously cited information (Dr. Sood's explanation). Wait, no—Dr. Sood's explanation is about music and dopamine (feeling happy), and the highlighted sentence extends that to positive thinking about schoolwork. Since this extension is a new claim (not directly from Dr. Sood's statement), does it need a citation? Wait, maybe the key is: the highlighted sentence is using the information from Dr. Sood (cited) to make a further claim. But in academic writing, if you are making an inference or a new claim based on a cited source, do you need to cite? Wait, no—the highlighted sentence is a conclusion derived from the evidence (Dr. Sood's explanation). Wait, maybe the correct approach is: the highlighted sentence is presenting an argument that is based on the prior cited research (Dr. Sood's work). But is the connection between feeling happy (from dopamine) and positive thinking about schoolwork common knowledge? Probably not. So, does the highlighted sentence need a citation? Wait, no—actually, the highlighted sentence is a logical extension of the cited information. Wait, maybe I got it wrong. Let's re - think: The first part (Dr. Sood's quote) is cited. The highlighted sentence is explaining the implication of that quote for student schoolwork attitude. In some cases, if the implication is not obvious or is a new claim, a citation might be needed, but if it's a logical deduction from the cited source, maybe not. Wait, but the question is whether the highlighted sentence needs a citation. Let's analyze: The highlighted sentence says "Because music causes the release of feel - good hormones, students are more likely to think positively about their schoolwork...". The "music causes release of feel - good hormones" is from Dr. Sood (cited), but the "students are more likely to think positively about schoolwork" is a new claim. However, is the link between feeling good (from hormones) and positive schoolwork attitude a claim that requires a citation? If it's a common - sense link, maybe not, but in academic terms, even a logical extension might need support. But wait, the highlighted sentence is using the cited research to support its own claim. Wait, no—the highlighted sentence is a conclusion drawn from the cited evidence. In academic writing, when you draw a conclusion from a cited source, you don't need to cite again if the conclusion is a direct logical consequence. But maybe the answer is that it needs a citation because the claim about positive schoolwork attitude is not the same as the claim about feeling happy (from Dr. Sood), and the connection is a new assertion. Wait, I'm confused. Let's start over. The rule for citations: you need to cite when you use someone else's ideas, research, or data. The highlighted sentence is making a claim about how music affects students' attitude towards schoolwork. The evidence for this claim is the earlier - cited Dr. Sood's research on music and dopamine. But the highlighted sentence is not directly quoting or paraphrasing Dr. Sood's words about schoolwork—Dr. Sood only talked about dopamine and feeling happy. The highlighted sentence is extending that to schoolwork. So, this extension is a new claim, and if there's no other source to support the link between feeling happy and positive schoolwork attitude, then a citation would be needed. But maybe the answer is that it needs a citation because the claim about the impact on schoolwork is not from the cited source and is a new assertion.
# Answer:
Needs a citation

Sovi.AI - AI Math Tutor

QUESTION IMAGE

Question

Explanation:

Answer: