Question

how do these excerpts from the text relate to one another?
a one offers evidence in support of a claim, while the other provides evidence to the contrary.
b one argues the need for science, while the other discusses the inevitability of random errors.
c one provides a theoretical framework, while the other presents persuasion techniques.
d one discusses the definition of a word, and the other provides related examples and context.
excerpt 1
excerpt 2
stories, recipes, personal experie
the things that were whispered to us w
young often outweigh scientific fact. th
because we believe them, so, naturally
sometimes quickly, they become some
disparate pieces of the systems that de

Explanation:

To solve this, we analyze each option:

• Option A: The excerpts don't show conflicting evidence (one for, one against), so A is wrong.
• Option B: There's no mention of "need for science" or "random errors" in the context, so B is incorrect.
• Option C: The excerpts don't involve a theoretical framework and persuasion techniques, so C is out.
• Option D: One excerpt might define a concept (e.g., about beliefs/whispered things), and the other provides examples (stories, recipes, personal experiences) and context related to it. This matches the relationship.

Answer:

D. One discusses the definition of a word, and the other provides related examples and context.