Question

in maryland v. king (2012), the supreme court
o ruled that police are allowed to seize and search the digital contents of a cell
phone during an arrest.
o ruled that police are constitutionally prohibited from seizing and searching
the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest.
o upheld a policy of dna testing of arrestees without providing evidence of
individualized suspicion.
o ruled that law enforcement cannot attach a gps device to a persons car and
monitor his or her movements without a warrant.

Explanation:

In Maryland v. King (2012), the Supreme - Court upheld a policy of DNA testing of arrestees with probable cause as a legitimate police booking procedure. It was not about cell - phone searches. The ruling was related to DNA collection, not GPS tracking or cell - phone content searches during arrest.

Answer:

upheld a policy of DNA testing of arrestees without providing evidence of individualized suspicion.