Question

this passage is from a 2003 interview with major general romeo dallaire. he was the commander of a un peacekeeping force during the 1994 genocide in rwanda, in africa. its just like the argument around the term \genocide.\ i mean, its a useless argument. human beings are being killed in the thousands, it could be in the hundreds of thousands. you dont need the term \genocide\ to decide to help other human beings. ... when people were being killed in yugoslavia the whole damn world got really concerned, and the western world mobilized everybody they could to respond to that. ... why is it that the black africans sitting there being slaughtered by the thousands get nothing? why is it when a bunch of white europeans get slaughtered in yugoslavia you cant put enough capability in there? there were more people killed, injured, internally displaced and refugeed in less than a hundred days in what is dallaires opinion about the effectiveness of the uns peacekeeping efforts in cases of genocide? he believes that the un does all it can to stop genocide in progress. he thinks that the international community cares about some people more than others. he argues that individual governments are better equipped to intervene in conflicts. he suggests that a better definition of genocide must be created

Explanation:

Dallaire contrasts the Western - world's response to the killings in Yugoslavia and Rwanda, indicating unequal concern in the international community.

Answer:

He thinks that the international community cares about some people more than others.