Question

1. was the person who drew this cartoon a supporter of jackson? how do you know?

Explanation:

To answer this, we need to analyze the cartoon's depiction of Jackson (e.g., symbols, tone, actions shown). If the cartoon portrays Jackson positively (e.g., heroic, effective, with favorable imagery) or negatively (critical, mocking). For example, if it shows Jackson as a strong leader addressing issues (like the Bank War) in a positive light, it suggests support. If it mocks his policies (e.g., "King Andrew" cartoons criticizing his use of power), it's opposition. Since the cartoon isn't provided, we assume typical Jackson-era cartoons: anti - Jackson cartoons often depicted him as "King Andrew" (criticizing overreach), pro - Jackson ones showed him as a defender of the common man.

To determine if the cartoonist supported Jackson, analyze the cartoon's portrayal (symbols, tone, actions). For example, anti - Jackson cartoons (like "King Andrew") mock his power; pro - ones show him as a common - man defender. Without the cartoon, we use common Jackson - era cartoon tropes: if it’s a “King Andrew” - style (criticizing), the artist opposed; if it shows him positively (e.g., fighting the bank for the people), the artist supported.

Answer:

(Assuming a typical anti - Jackson cartoon like "King Andrew") No, the cartoonist was not a supporter. We know because cartoons like "King Andrew" depicted Jackson as a monarch - like figure, criticizing his use of executive power and overreach, showing the artist’s opposition to Jackson’s policies and leadership style.
(If it was a pro - Jackson cartoon) Yes, the cartoonist was a supporter. We know because the cartoon portrays Jackson as a defender of the common man (e.g., fighting the national bank to protect ordinary citizens), using positive imagery and tone to show approval of his actions.