Question

population to be twenty - nine percent hispanic and forty - five percent non - hispanic white. other law enforcement department reports in cities across the nation show similar racial disparities. these numbers open curfew laws to the criticism that they are enforced in a racially discriminatory way.
the aclu has succeeded in striking down at least one curfew law because of concerns over parental rights. along with other community and civil rights groups, the aclu continues to pursue other cases, arguing that curfew law enforcement can only exacerbate tension and crime. to arrest teens for driving home from the movies, playing basketball in the park, or simply walking their dogs is to punish them for being outside their homes—a policy inconsistent with the individual rights established in the u.s. constitution.
what is the authors main claim or argument?
law enforcement should only enforce teen curfews in densely populated areas.
legal curfews should exist only when parents do not administer a curfew.
enforcing teen curfews will lead to growing resentment and distrust of the police force.
legal curfews for teens are an unnecessary violation of individual liberties and should be abolished.

Explanation:

The text mentions ACLU - led criticism, racial disparities, and conflicts with individual rights in the U.S. Constitution, all pointing to curfews as a violation of liberties.

Answer:

Legal curfews for teens are an unnecessary violation of individual liberties and should be abolished.