Question

pregunta 1 - 17
text 1
philosopher g. e. moores most influential work details the concept of common - sense. he asserts that there are certain beliefs that all people, including philosophers, know instinctively to be true; whether or not they protest otherwise. among them, that they have bodies and that they are in a world with other objects that have three dimensions. moores careful work on common sense may seem obvious but was in fact groundbreaking.
text 2
external world skepticism is a philosophical stance supposing that we cant be sure of the existence of anything outside our own minds. during a lecture, g. e. moore once offered a proof refuting this stance by holding out his hands and saying, here is one hand, and here is another. philosophers relatively reject this proof (annalisa coliva called it an obviously annoying failure) but have found it a challenge to articulate exactly why the proof fails.
based on the texts, how would the author of text 1 most likely respond to proponents of the philosophical stance outlined in text 2?
by pointing out that moore would assert that external world skepticism is at odds with other beliefs those proponents must unavoidably hold
by suggesting that an instinctive distaste for moores position is preventing external world skeptics from constructing a sufficiently rigorous refutation of moore
by arguing that if it is valid to assert that some facts are true based on instinct, it is also valid to assert that some proofs are inadequate based on instinct
by agreeing with those proponents that moores treatment of positions that contradict his own is fundamentally unserious

Explanation:

Breve explicación:

El autor del Texto 1 presenta la idea de G. E. Moore de que hay ciertas creencias intuitivas que todos tienen. El escepticismo sobre el mundo exterior del Texto 2 está en contradicción con esas creencias intuitivas que Moore defiende. Por lo tanto, el autor del Texto 1 probablemente argumentaría que el escepticismo está en desacuerdo con otras creencias que los defensores del escepticismo deben tener.

Respuesta:

• By pointing out that Moore would assert that external - world skepticism is at odds with other beliefs those proponents must unavoidably hold. (Al señalar que Moore afirmaría que el escepticismo sobre el mundo exterior está en desacuerdo con otras creencias que los defensores del escepticismo deben tener inevitablemente.)

Answer:

Breve explicación:

El autor del Texto 1 presenta la idea de G. E. Moore de que hay ciertas creencias intuitivas que todos tienen. El escepticismo sobre el mundo exterior del Texto 2 está en contradicción con esas creencias intuitivas que Moore defiende. Por lo tanto, el autor del Texto 1 probablemente argumentaría que el escepticismo está en desacuerdo con otras creencias que los defensores del escepticismo deben tener.

Respuesta:

• By pointing out that Moore would assert that external - world skepticism is at odds with other beliefs those proponents must unavoidably hold. (Al señalar que Moore afirmaría que el escepticismo sobre el mundo exterior está en desacuerdo con otras creencias que los defensores del escepticismo deben tener inevitablemente.)