Question

proponents of a ban also ignore that football remains popular among viewers. while youth participation in tackle football may have dropped, interest in professional football remains substantial, with nfl games averaging tens of millions of viewers and achieving tv ratings higher than any other live sport. although viewership has dipped recently, a 2014 study showed that the trend over the past thirty years has been a steady rise, while the ratings of other professional sports either declined or remained the same. these numbers signal footballs continued importance today. given that young people are prone to risk - taking, playing tackle football with the appropriate safety measures is an excellent positive outlet for aggressive energy. with each snap of the football, players must instantly assess rapidly. the seventh paragraph is meant to support the authors main claim that it is excessive and unreasonable to ban youth football. whats wrong with the authors argument in the seventh paragraph? the author fails to compare trends in football viewership with trends for other live televised sports. professional footballs television ratings are not relevant to whether or not it makes sense for youth football to be banned. the long - term downward trend in professional footballs television ratings is not explained.

Explanation:

The author's claim is about banning youth football. However, the seventh - paragraph uses professional football's TV ratings as evidence. Professional football and youth football are different entities, so professional football's TV ratings are not relevant to the ban of youth football.

Answer:

Professional football's television ratings are not relevant to whether or not it makes sense for youth football to be banned.