QUESTION IMAGE
Question
- a public opinion survey explored the relationship between age and support for increasing the minimum wage. the results are summarized in the two - way table below.
| yes | no | no opinion | total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 to 60 | 20 | 35 | 20 | 75 |
| over 60 | 55 | 15 | 5 | 75 |
| total | 100 | 70 | 30 | 200 |
a) give an example of a joint relative frequency and interpret it in context.
b) give an example of a marginal relative frequency and interpret it in context.
c) give an example of a conditional relative frequency and interpret it in context.
Step1: Define joint relative frequency
Joint relative frequency is the ratio of a cell - value to the total number of observations. For example, consider the number of 18 - to - 30 - year - olds who support the minimum wage increase. The joint relative frequency is $\frac{25}{200}=0.125$. This means that 12.5% of all the people surveyed are 18 - to - 30 - year - olds who support increasing the minimum wage.
Step2: Define marginal relative frequency
Marginal relative frequency is the ratio of a row - total or column - total to the grand total. For example, the marginal relative frequency of people who support the minimum wage increase is $\frac{100}{200}=0.5$. This means that 50% of all the people surveyed support increasing the minimum wage.
Step3: Define conditional relative frequency
Conditional relative frequency is the ratio of a cell - value to a row - total or column - total (depending on the condition). For example, among those over 60, the conditional relative frequency of those who support the minimum wage increase is $\frac{55}{75}\approx0.733$. This means that about 73.3% of people over 60 support increasing the minimum wage.
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
a) Joint relative frequency: $\frac{25}{200}=0.125$. Interpretation: 12.5% of all surveyed are 18 - to - 30 - year - olds who support increasing the minimum wage.
b) Marginal relative frequency: $\frac{100}{200}=0.5$. Interpretation: 50% of all surveyed support increasing the minimum wage.
c) Conditional relative frequency: $\frac{55}{75}\approx0.733$. Interpretation: About 73.3% of people over 60 support increasing the minimum wage.