Question

question 4 of 10
in worcester v. georgia, the supreme court ruled that:
a. the state of georgia could control who was allowed to enter cherokee territory.
b. the cherokee nation was not legally considered a foreign nation.
c. the cherokee nation was entitled to the land that it occupied.
d. the state of georgia did not have the right to enforce laws on cherokee territory.

Explanation:

In Worcester v. Georgia, the U.S. Supreme Court held that Georgia could not enforce its laws in Cherokee territory as the Cherokee Nation had a degree of sovereignty over its own land. The Court's decision affirmed the Cherokee's right to self - governance and the state of Georgia's lack of authority to intrude on Cherokee land.

Answer:

D. the state of Georgia did not have the right to enforce laws on Cherokee territory.