Question

question 1 question 2 what would you do? though you decide not to join in the basketball betting, you do strike up a conversation with steve, who reveals that he runs pools covering other sporting events, as well as the academy awards, and makes thousands a year \by taking my 20%.\ he also mentions that he gives back part of their entry fee to anyone who gets three others to join. more and more uncomfortable, you return to your apartment and face a decision. you know federal authorities have better things to go than break up private social games. but the scope and dynamics of steves betting pools strike you as something bigger. what do you do? you can bring your information to the u.s. attorney and see if she would like to open an investigation into potential illegal gambling or even rico charges. this just might be big enough for law enforcement to get involved. you can keep it to yourself. after all, there are thousands of march madness pools across the country, and going after them would be like prosecuting everyone who illegally downloads music. besides, federal laws have elements and jurisdictional aspects that must be satisfied. better to just forget about it.

Explanation:

Steve's gambling pools seem large - scale and potentially illegal. Reporting to the U.S. attorney could initiate a proper investigation. While there are many similar pools, this one might be significant enough to warrant law - enforcement action.

Answer:

There is no clear - cut right or wrong answer, but considering the potential illegal nature of Steve's activities and the scale mentioned, the more responsible option could be: You can bring your information to the U.S. attorney and see if she would like to open an investigation into potential illegal gambling or even RICO charges. This just might be big enough for law enforcement to get involved.