Question

questions to think about
directions: study the information in the chart. then answer these questions. use complete sentences.

1. north korea has a larger population than sweden. sweden has a higher economic output per person. which country is more productive?

1. compare life expectancy and healthcare in the two countries. which has a higher standard of living? explain your answer.

1. if north korea’s output per person increased, do you think its standard of living would improve? why or why not?

copyright © by pearson education, inc., or its affiliates. all rights reserved.
71

Answer:

Since the chart is not provided, I'll give general guidance on how to answer these questions based on typical economic and social data:

Question 1

To determine which country is more productive, we use the concept of productivity, which is often measured by output per person (GDP per capita). Productivity = Total Output (GDP) / Population.

• Let’s denote:
• North Korea’s population: \( P_{NK} \), Output: \( O_{NK} \)
• Sweden’s population: \( P_{S} \), Output: \( O_{S} \)
• Output per person (productivity) for North Korea: \( \frac{O_{NK}}{P_{NK}} \)
• Output per person (productivity) for Sweden: \( \frac{O_{S}}{P_{S}} \)

From the problem, we know Sweden has a higher output per person (\( \frac{O_{S}}{P_{S}} > \frac{O_{NK}}{P_{NK}} \)). So Sweden is more productive because productivity (output per person) is a direct measure of how much each person in the country produces, and Sweden has a higher value here.

Question 2

Life expectancy and healthcare are key indicators of the standard of living.

• Life Expectancy: It reflects the overall health and quality of life. Countries with better healthcare, nutrition, and living conditions tend to have higher life expectancy.
• Healthcare: Access to quality healthcare (hospitals, doctors, medical technology, health insurance) improves health outcomes, reduces mortality, and enhances well - being.

Typically, Sweden (a developed, market - economy country with a strong welfare state) has better healthcare infrastructure, more investment in public health, and higher life expectancy compared to North Korea (a country with more limited resources for healthcare due to various factors like economic sanctions, different economic system, and resource allocation priorities). So Sweden likely has a higher standard of living as these factors (life expectancy and healthcare) are strongly correlated with the overall quality of life.

Question 3

Output per person (which is related to income and access to goods/services) is a major factor in the standard of living.

• If North Korea’s output per person increases, it means there is more production of goods (like food, consumer products) and services (like healthcare, education - related services) per person.
• With more output per person, people can have better access to food, better healthcare (if the increased output is allocated to healthcare), better housing, and other necessities and amenities. However, other factors also matter:
• Income Distribution: If the increased output is concentrated in the hands of a few, the standard of living for the general population may not improve much.
• Quality of Output: If the output is of low quality (e.g., low - quality consumer goods), it may not improve the standard of living as much.
• External Factors: Sanctions can still limit access to some imported goods and technologies. But generally, an increase in output per person is a positive sign and would likely lead to an improvement in the standard of living for most people, assuming the output is distributed reasonably and is of acceptable quality.

If we assume we have the actual data (from the chart) for population and output:

For Question 1 (with data example)

Suppose:

• North Korea: Population = 26 million, Output = $20 billion. Then output per person = \( \frac{20,000,000,000}{26,000,000}\approx\$769.23 \)
• Sweden: Population = 10 million, Output = $500 billion. Then output per person = \( \frac{500,000,000,000}{10,000,000}=\$50,000 \)

Clearly, Sweden has a higher output per person, so it is more productive.

For Question 2 (with data example)

• Life Expectancy: Sweden has a life expectancy of around 82 - 83 years, North Korea around 72 - 73 years (approximate, pre - pandemic and pre - recent sanctions - related changes).
• Healthcare: Sweden has 4.2 doctors per 1000 people, North Korea has around 1.5 doctors per 1000 people (approximate). So Sweden has better healthcare and higher life expectancy, leading to a higher standard of living.

For Question 3 (conceptual with data - driven logic)

If North Korea’s output per person was $700 and it increases to $1000, with a population of 26 million, the total additional output is \( 26,000,000\times(1000 - 700)=7,800,000,000 \). This additional output can be used to import more food (if possible), improve domestic food production, build more hospitals, or train more doctors. So, in general, an increase in output per person should lead to an improvement in the standard of living, although other factors can moderate the extent of this improvement.

Final Answers (based on typical scenarios and general economic logic)

1. Sweden is more productive because it has a higher output per person.
2. Sweden has a higher standard of living. Life expectancy is higher in Sweden as it has better healthcare infrastructure, more investment in public health, and a more developed welfare system. Its healthcare system provides better access to quality medical services, which is reflected in lower mortality rates and better health outcomes.
3. Yes, its standard of living would likely improve. An increase in output per person means more goods and services are available per individual. This can lead to better access to food, healthcare, housing, and other necessities. While other factors like income distribution and external sanctions can affect the extent, the increase in output per person is a fundamental driver of improved living standards as it directly relates to the availability of resources for consumption and investment in well - being.