Question

read the claim and the supporting evidence. claims: it is crucial that teenagers not be allowed to drive at night. evidence: car accidents involving teen drivers are far more likely to occur between the hours of 9 p.m. and midnight. why does the evidence support the claim? choose the analysis that better explains the connection. banning such driving would dramatically reduce harm to teenagers. laws should protect people from engaging in activities that are likely to result in injury.

Explanation:

The claim is about banning teens from night driving. The evidence shows more teen accidents at night. The first analysis directly connects banning night driving (the claim's action) to reducing harm (from the evidence's accident data). The second is a general statement about laws, not directly linking to the claim - evidence relationship here.

Answer:

Banning such driving would dramatically reduce harm to teenagers.