Question

read the excerpt from elie wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea. why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into poland? why were the tracks leading to birkenau never bombed? i have put these questions to american presidents and generals and to high - ranking soviet officers. since moscow and washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their “production”? that not a single allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. how does wiesel’s choice of genre prove beneficial in the excerpt? ○ it shows him trying to reconcile the events of his past in poland so he can move on with his future in america. ○ it gives him the chance to question presidents and generals about their positions regarding the holocaust. ○ it allows him a moment to reflect on why the world neglected to aid the jewish people during their greatest time of need. ○ it provides him the opportunity to accuse american and soviet leaders of keeping the holocaust a secret.

Explanation:

The excerpt is a reflective, personal nonfiction work (memoir) from Wiesel. He poses rhetorical questions about the Allies' inaction during the Holocaust, using the genre to process and reflect on the world's failure to help Jewish people in crisis.

• The first option is incorrect, as the text does not focus on reconciling his past to move to America.
• The second option is incorrect, as he states he asked these questions to leaders, but the genre's benefit is not the act of questioning them, but the reflection.
• The fourth option is incorrect, as he does not accuse leaders of keeping the Holocaust a secret—he notes they knew, but did nothing.
• The third option is correct, as the memoir genre allows him to reflect publicly on the world's neglect of endangered Jewish people.

Answer:

It allows him a moment to reflect on why the world neglected to aid the Jewish people during their greatest time of need.