Question

remy, from the blog
apping with remy,\ asked his readers, \if you had the chance, would you want to be famous?\ of the 2,200 readers who responded, 42% said no, and all were female. what does this show?
no meaningful conclusion is possible without knowing something more about the characteristics of remy’s readers.
the survey is meaningless because of undercoverage bias.
the survey would have been more meaningful if remy had picked a random sample of the readers who responded.
the survey would have been more meaningful if remy had used a control group.
this was a legitimate sample, drawn randomly from his readers, and is of adequate size to allow the conclusion that most of remy’s readers want to be famous.

Explanation:

This is a voluntary response survey, where only readers who chose to respond are included. We lack key details about the total reader population (like demographics, how many didn't respond) to draw valid conclusions. Undercoverage bias isn't the issue here, and the sample isn't random or legitimate for generalizing to all readers. A control group is irrelevant to this survey type.

Answer:

No meaningful conclusion is possible without knowing something more about the characteristics of Remy's readers.