Question

the second amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self - defense within the home, and that the district’s handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles and shotguns be kept unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock violated this guarantee.

○ plessy v. ferguson

○ new york state rifle & pistol v. bruen

○ katz v. united states

○ district of columbia v. heller

Explanation:

The description outlines the core holding of a U.S. Supreme Court case that established an individual Second Amendment right to firearms for home self-defense, striking down D.C.'s handgun ban and storage requirements. This matches the ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller. Plessy v. Ferguson upheld racial segregation, New York State Rifle & Pistol v. Bruen expanded gun rights to public carry, and Katz v. United States focused on Fourth Amendment privacy rights.

Answer:

District of Columbia v. Heller