Question

select all that apply. alana wanted to speak about climate conditions that might favor tornado formation in the united states. for testimony she used a document by researchers schaefer and marzban on the noaa website, and she said, \schaefer and talam (1998) looked at the mean sea surface temperature (sst) in the strip 5 deg. n to 5 deg. s and 180 deg. w to 150 deg. w and wrote, a kruskal - wallis h test was then used to see if any difference in different tornado measures exists between el nino, la nina and neutral years. also the entire contiguous u.s. and three sub - areas were considered. all six of these combinations failed to have significance at the 99 percent level. one could not state with confidence that el nino/la nina had any effect on tornado or strong tornado activity.\ for which two reasons should she have paraphrased instead of using a direct quotation? the quotation is longer than two or three sentences. the wording of the quotation is cumbersome and contains technical terms. the source of the document is a government agency. the quotation is from an online document.

Explanation:

Long quotations are often better - paraphrased for readability. Cumbersome and technical - laden quotes can be hard for the audience to follow, so paraphrasing makes the information more accessible. The source being a government agency or an online document is not a reason for paraphrasing.

Answer:

• The quotation is longer than two or three sentences.
• The wording of the quotation is cumbersome and contains technical terms.