Question

take a look at the statement below. fish meal is better than artificial fertilizers. how could this statement be revised to make it a hypothesis? fish meal is safer than artificial fertilizers, but it does not make plants grow. fish meal is a better fertilizer than artificial fertilizer because fish meal is natural. plants that are fertilized with fish meal will grow taller than plants that receive artificial fertilizer. plants that receive artificial fertilizer will be better than plants that receive fish meal.

Explanation:

A good hypothesis is test - able and specific. The original statement is too general. A revised hypothesis should clearly state the variable being measured (e.g., plant growth). For example, it could specify a way to measure 'better' such as plant height or yield.

Answer:

Plants that are fertilized with fish meal will grow taller than plants that receive artificial fertilizer.