Question

ted ed viewing guide where do you stand? do you think the bill of rights is necessary or unnecessary? explain your answer! why wasnt the bill of rights originally included in the us constitution? how did the federalists and anti - federalists compromise on the constitution? link not working? click here

Explanation:

1. The Bill of Rights wasn't originally included in the US Constitution because Federalists believed the Constitution as - written was sufficient to protect rights. They thought a list of rights might be seen as limiting, implying that only those listed were protected. Also, they were concerned about the time - consuming process of adding it.
2. The Bill of Rights is necessary as it explicitly protects fundamental freedoms like freedom of speech, religion, and the press. It serves as a safeguard against potential government overreach and provides clear legal protections for citizens.
3. The Federalists and Anti - Federalists compromised on the Constitution by the Federalists agreeing to add a Bill of Rights once the Constitution was ratified. This helped gain the support of the Anti - Federalists who were worried about a strong central government infringing on individual liberties.

Answer:

1. Federalists thought the Constitution was sufficient and a list of rights could be limiting and time - consuming to add.
2. It is necessary as it protects fundamental freedoms and safeguards against government overreach.
3. Federalists agreed to add a Bill of Rights after ratification to gain Anti - Federalist support.