Question

these statements are from an evaluation of john schwartzs article. read each statement, then use the drop - down menus to identify the correct order in which the sentences should appear.
in his article, john schwartz explains why convincing the public to use recycled water will be a difficult challenge.
schwartz provides evidence to support his idea, including the results of a study in which 13 percent of participants refused to try recy
the article m 1 tifies ways to overcome the potential public rejection of recycled water.
he cites experts v × 2 here is a yuck factor related to the use of treated wastewater.
3
4

Explanation:

To determine the correct order, we analyze the logical flow of an article evaluation:

1. Introduce the main idea: "In his article, John Schwartz explains why convincing the public to use recycled water will be a difficult challenge." (This sets the topic.)
2. Explain the challenge (reason): "He cites experts where there is a 'yuck factor' related to the use of treated wastewater." (Explains why the challenge exists.)
3. Provide evidence: "Schwartz provides evidence to support his idea, including the results of a study in which 13 percent of participants refused to try recy..." (Backs up the challenge with data.)
4. Offer solutions/next steps: "The article identifies ways to overcome the potential public rejection of recycled water." (Addresses how to solve the challenge.)

So the correct order is:

1. In his article, John Schwartz explains why convincing the public to use recycled water will be a difficult challenge.
2. He cites experts where there is a "yuck factor" related to the use of treated wastewater.
3. Schwartz provides evidence to support his idea, including the results of a study in which 13 percent of participants refused to try recy...
4. The article identifies ways to overcome the potential public rejection of recycled water.

(If the dropdown options correspond to these sentences, the order for the numbered slots would be:
1: "In his article...", 2: "He cites experts...", 3: "Schwartz provides evidence...", 4: "The article identifies...")

Answer:

To determine the correct order, we analyze the logical flow of an article evaluation:

1. Introduce the main idea: "In his article, John Schwartz explains why convincing the public to use recycled water will be a difficult challenge." (This sets the topic.)
2. Explain the challenge (reason): "He cites experts where there is a 'yuck factor' related to the use of treated wastewater." (Explains why the challenge exists.)
3. Provide evidence: "Schwartz provides evidence to support his idea, including the results of a study in which 13 percent of participants refused to try recy..." (Backs up the challenge with data.)
4. Offer solutions/next steps: "The article identifies ways to overcome the potential public rejection of recycled water." (Addresses how to solve the challenge.)

So the correct order is:

1. In his article, John Schwartz explains why convincing the public to use recycled water will be a difficult challenge.
2. He cites experts where there is a "yuck factor" related to the use of treated wastewater.
3. Schwartz provides evidence to support his idea, including the results of a study in which 13 percent of participants refused to try recy...
4. The article identifies ways to overcome the potential public rejection of recycled water.

(If the dropdown options correspond to these sentences, the order for the numbered slots would be:
1: "In his article...", 2: "He cites experts...", 3: "Schwartz provides evidence...", 4: "The article identifies...")