Question

though the outcomes of tinker and schenck differed, which best describes what these court decisions have in common? they agreed that political expression could be restricted. they agreed that libel was not protected speech. they agreed that symbolic speech could be protected. they agreed that speech rights could be limited to protect safety.

Explanation:

In Tinker v. Des Moines, students' symbolic speech (wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam - war) was protected as long as it didn't disrupt the school environment. In Schenck v. United States, the Court held that speech creating a clear and present danger (in that case, anti - draft leaflets during WWI) could be restricted. Both cases show that speech rights can be limited to protect safety or prevent disruption.

Answer:

They agreed that speech rights could be limited to protect safety.