Question

what were some provisions of the dred scott case? select three responses.
□ no black person, free or enslaved, could be a us citizen.
□ all black people were subject to becoming enslaved.
□ there could be no legal ban on slavery in the territories.
□ the territories could retain their popular sovereignty.
□ the missouri compromise was unconstitutional.

Explanation:

1. In the Dred Scott case, the Supreme Court ruled that no black person (free or enslaved) could be a US citizen.
2. It also stated that the Missouri Compromise, which banned slavery in certain territories, was unconstitutional, meaning there could be no legal ban on slavery in the territories.
3. The idea that all black people were subject to becoming enslaved was not a direct provision of the case, and the popular sovereignty idea was undermined by the ruling (so that option is incorrect).

Answer:

A. No black person, free or enslaved, could be a US citizen.
C. There could be no legal ban on slavery in the territories.
E. The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.