Question

why was united states v. lopez(1995) important? the court gave a broad interpretation of the commerce clause that expanded the power of the federal government over the states. it was the first time that the court had used the tenth amendment to limit the power of congress. the court found the line - item veto unconstitutional. it was the first time since the new deal that the supreme court limited the power of congress as outlined under the commerce clause. question 6 (4 points) ________ compels state governments to obey costly federal regulations but does not reimburse those costs. a grant - in - aid an unfunded mandate a block grant general revenue sharing

Explanation:

In United States v. Lopez (1995), the Supreme Court limited Congress's power under the commerce clause, marking the first such limitation since the New Deal. An unfunded mandate is when the federal government requires state governments to follow regulations without providing funds for implementation.

Answer:

For the first question: It was the first time since the New Deal that the Supreme Court limited the power of Congress as outlined under the commerce clause.
For the second question: An unfunded mandate