Question

1. why would the text say harrison “would have awed thor, the god of thunder.”?

Explanation:

To answer this, we need context about Harrison (likely a person with a notable action or trait related to power, force, or something "thunderous" like Thor's domain of thunder and strength). For example, if Harrison had a powerful presence, impact, or actions (like leadership, achievements with great force), comparing to Thor (god of thunder, associated with power, storms, might) makes sense. Maybe Harrison’s deeds were as impactful as Thor’s thunder - related might, so the text uses this mythological allusion to emphasize awe. Without the full text, we infer: the comparison to Thor (god of thunder, symbol of power/awe) implies Harrison had a powerful, awe - inspiring quality (e.g., strong leadership, impactful actions) worthy of such a mythic figure.

To determine why Harrison would be said to "awe Thor", we analyze the mythological context of Thor (god of thunder, symbolizing power/awe) and infer that Harrison likely had a powerful, awe - inspiring quality (e.g., strong leadership, impactful actions) comparable to Thor's thunder - related might, justifying the allusion.

Answer:

Harrison likely had a powerful, awe - inspiring quality (e.g., strong leadership, impactful actions) comparable to Thor's (god of thunder) thunder - related might, justifying the text's allusion to him "awing Thor". (Exact answer depends on full text context, but this is the inferred reasoning.)