Question

architecture
modern philosophy of “out with the old, in with the new” has
n used and abused for years. oftentimes, it has more to do
making a profit rather than a legitimate need for something
r. across the united states, beautiful, historic architecture is
uently destroyed to make way for malls, high-rise apartment
buildings, franchise homes, and other structures. unfortunately,
this is done to protect our history.
over the past several years, it has become increasingly common
big-name developers to tear down victorian, craftsman, and
tional buildings. this destruction is often performed with the
notion that it is the property that holds the true value, not the
icture that sits on it. likewise, homeowners have begun to
ue their property’s location over the house they have spent
any years living in. little regard is given to the painstaking
details and craftsmanship that went into these buildings, nor the
nate beauty of hand - carved woodwork and ornamentation. “out
with the old, in with the new” has resulted in people no longer
appreciating the history and artistic integrity of our country’s
oldest buildings and failing to realize that once “the new” is
bought in, “the old” is lost to us forever.
it is bad enough that developers and private citizens are blind to
the beauty around them, what is worse is that local governments
refuse to step in and prevent this destruction. cities and towns
need to stand up to large developers that flash money around in
2026 edmentum. all rights reserved.
select the correct answer.
how could the writer improve the underlined sentence to remove the logical fallacy?
a. everyone who appreciates our country’s oldest buildings should forget the architectural philosophy “out with
the old, in with the new.”
b. the “out with the old, in with the new” approach to architecture is clearly a result of people who no longer care
about our country’s oldest buildings.
c. anyone who accepts the “out with the old, in with the new” architectural philosophy is a menace to society.
d. some people have embraced the “out with the old, in with the new” philosophy, as the number of applications
for demolition permits hit a record high this year.
reset
next
sign out
feb 2 3:34 us

Explanation:

The underlined sentence presents a false dilemma, framing old and new architecture as an absolute, mutually exclusive choice. Option A revises this by tying appreciation for old buildings to rejecting the extreme "out with the old, in with the new" philosophy, removing the false either/or framing while keeping the core argument. The other options either retain the fallacy (B) or use overly extreme, unsubstantiated claims (C, D) that don't fix the logical issue.

Answer:

A. Everyone who appreciates our country's oldest buildings should forget the architectural philosophy "out with the old, in with the new."