Question

article vi: the supremacy clause

• evaluation: courts examine laws constitutionality and determine if they violate constitutional higher authorities.
• injunction: courts can grant injunctions against laws or policies of dubious constitutionality, effectively pausing them until a decision can be reached.

to bring a case before the supreme court, someone must challenge a specific law and get approval to present an argument. courts do not review laws on their own initiative.

• accepting cases: courts review appeals before accepting them to determine if they are substantial or frivolous; most never make it to the supreme court
• legal battle: cases with merit are brought to the court, where two sides present their arguments before ceding to the court’s constitution - based decision

what happens if a federal judge issues an injunction against a state law?

• the state law is temporarily suspended.
• the state law is confirmed constitutional.
• the state law is permanently invalidated.

Explanation:

The provided text defines an injunction as a court order that pauses laws or policies of questionable constitutionality until a final decision is reached. This matches the effect of a federal judge's injunction against a state law.

Answer:

The state law is temporarily suspended.